
- Image by New Media Days via Flickr
The Obama Administration recently mentioned that it is considering pursuing a lawsuit against Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks. Opinions about whether the federal government should try to capture and prosecute Assange, however, vary wildly. This is easily seen by reading a handful of blogs. Many supports Assange’s WikiLeaks site while others cry treason.
The real question is whether the Obama Administration is pursuing legal recourse because Assange committed a crime or because he publicly shamed the administration by showing how easy it is to obtain secure documents. If Assange has actually committed a crime then it makes sense to put him in court. If, however, this is more about saving face, then it is a misuse of sales and income tax collected throughout the country.
The U.S. isn’t the only country looking for Assange. INTERPOL has placed him on a list that alerts numerous countries to keep an eye out for him.
Assange’s lawyer claims that this is persecution. He maintains that although Assange is wanted for sexual misconduct in Sweden, he has committed no crime significant enough to merit these actions. The lawyer’s complaints, though, have thus far gone unheard by INTERPOL. It seems that everyone is out to get this guy.
The interesting thing is that few people are discussing whether Assange is actually responsible for leaking the documents. After all, he did not steal them from the Pentagon. Someone else did. Assange merely published them on his website after long deliberations with the Washington Post, which also published some of the files. So far there has been no mention of punishing the Washington Post’s owner, so why go after Assange with such ferocity?
Obviously the government should protect sensitive information and prevent it from falling into the wrong hands. But if it cannot protect that information well, it seems that they are at least partially responsible.




